Heard on Olbermann tonight: Tom Delay started a blog and had to shut it down minutes later. Why? A slew of comments, mostly hostile, some deliciously so. Down came the blog and all those comments . . . but not before James Risser re-posted everything.
Scroll down the page to read the “offending” comments. Here are a few choice excerpts.
Zalmay Khalilzad is now resigning as ambassador to Iraq. In my opinion, a staunch supporter of the war such as yourself should volunteer to fill this important post. It would do you some good to get first hand knowledge regarding Iraq . . .
Didn’t we already stick a fork in your ass and decide you’re done?
In case you thought this was a one-sided attack by us lib’ruls,
Tom, you corrupted the conservative cause and brought disgrace to our party. We can never forgive you for that. Please crawl back into your hole.
And even some celeb notice:
hi, tom!!!!
so glad you joined the blogosphere! now you can link to my articles and to michelle’s too 🙂
speaking of michelle, she just received a new batch of iraqi baby blood from general pace…if you would like to come up to nyc, drop in and you can suck on some of it too!
and, to you liberals on here….HAVE I TOLD YOU LATELY HOW MUCH I HATE YOU!!!!
December 10, 2006 | Unregistered Commenter ann coulter
Eh, that’s enough. Go see for yourself. (Warning: a lot of those comments are unimaginative, gay-baiting, and/or profane . . . leading me to believe most of these are wingnuts venting their anger. Us lib’ruls are far wittier.)
D.
And it did, of course. See: Japanese internment camps. The Canadians did it, too.
Big snip from a superb Daily Kos diary by Rock Strongo:
On Sunday afternoon, Washington, DC radio host Jerry Klein of WMAL was commenting on the Muslim Imams kicked off a flight. Klein suggested that all Muslims in the United States should be identified with a crescent-shape tattoo or a distinctive arm band, the phone lines jammed instantly.
Among the callers:
“Not only do you tattoo them in the middle of their forehead but you ship them out of this country … they are here to kill us.”
and:
Another said that tattoos, armbands and other identifying markers such as crescent marks on driver’s licenses, passports and birth certificates did not go far enough. “What good is identifying them?” he asked. “You have to set up encampments like during World War Two with the Japanese and Germans.”
Finally a half hour into his show, Klien revealed the game:
“I can’t believe any of you are sick enough to have agreed for one second with anything I said. For me to suggest to tattoo marks on people’s bodies, have them wear armbands, put a crescent moon on their driver’s license on their passport or birth certificate is disgusting. It’s beyond disgusting.
Because basically what you just did was show me how the German people allowed what happened to the Jews to happen … We need to separate them, we need to tattoo their arms, we need to make them wear the yellow Star of David, we need to put them in concentration camps, we basically just need to kill them all because they are dangerous.”
Recently, I asked one of our docs if he had to fend off any prejudice. His response (paraphrasing): “Hey, I’m Syrian. So few Americans even know where Syria is.” While I’m delighted he doesn’t have to deal with racist BS — he’s a helluva nice guy and a top-notch doctor, and he really doesn’t deserve any BS — I know that our government knows where Syria is, and they doubtless know where he is. My friend may be safe from local prejudice, but is he safe from our government?
It could happen here. It could happen again. Based on Jerry Klein’s callers, lots of folks are itching to see it happen again. And all it would take is another 9/11.
Sorry . . . but I’m in a pensive mood, thanks to booboo’s hate mail. See comments to the Hanukkah meme, below.
D.
On Wednesdays, between surgical cases, I hop around the political blogosphere. Seems us secular humanists have launched the opening salvo to this year’s War on Christmas. Folks, it’s gonna be ugly.
First, at Raw Story, Polish exchange student Michael Gromek talks about his Half-Year of Hell with Christian Fundamentalists (hat tip to One Good Move):
My host parents hadn’t had sex for the last 17 years because — so they told me — they were devoting their lives to God. They also wanted to know whether I drank alcohol. I admitted that I liked beer and wine. They told me I had the devil in my heart.
With all due respect to Catholic priests, no sex for 17 DAYS is pathological, let alone 17 years. Meanwhile, over at Digby’s blog, Digby and Tristero point out that the Quiverfull crowd aren’t just quaint patriarchs spreading their seed willy-nilly to fugly dress-wearing Prairie Muffins. They want good white Christian folk to breed like rabbits precisely to keep good white Christian folk in the majority. Here’s Digby:
Plenty of young people want to come to America and would be more than happy to pay into social security to support all of us old codgers. They just aren’t the “right kind” of people, if you know what I mean. So get to breeding, white bitches. You’ve got work to do.
I am all for having a big tent. But there is no political party on earth that is big enough for me and people who believe that liberalism’s great hope is to create policies that encourage women to have 14 children so we can “outbreed” the competition and make sure the wrong people don’t come in and ruin the place. That’s where I head for the exit.
But what do I know. I’m just a horn-headed Jew, precisely the kind of person who needs to be kept in the minority.
D.
This morning, I’ve been hanging out at Jurassic Pork’s place, catching up on my New York Times firewalled columns. He has posted a couple of tasty Maureen Dowd columns, and a fine Paul Krugman column, too.
My favorite bit from Maureen Dowd, neatly summarizing why the Repugs got their butts kicked:
Republicans were oddly oblivious to the fact that they had turned into a Thomas Nast cartoon: an unappetizing tableau of bloated, corrupt, dissembling, feckless white hacks who were leaving kids unprotected. Tom DeLay and Bob Ney sneaking out of Congress with dollar bills flying out of their pockets. Denny Hastert playing Cardinal Bernard Law, shielding Mark Foley. Rummy, cocky and obtuse as he presided over an imploding Iraq, while failing to give young men and women in the military the armor, support and strategy they needed to come home safely. Dick Cheney, vowing bullheadedly to move “full speed ahead” on Iraq no matter what the voters decided. W. frantically yelling about how Democrats would let the terrorists win, when his lame-brained policies had spawned more terrorists.
She concludes with ruminations about the victory of estrogen-powered politics over testosterone-fueled blundering:
Because of the power of female consumers, some marketing experts predict we will end up a matriarchy. This year, women also flexed their muscle at the polls, transformed into electoral Furies by the administration’s stubborn course in Iraq.
On Tuesday, 51 percent of the voters were women, and 55 percent of women voted for the Democratic candidate. It was a revival of the style of Bill Clinton, dubbed our first female president, who knitted together a winning coalition of independents, moderates and suburbanites.
According to The Times’s exit polls, women were more likely than men to want some or all of the troops to be withdrawn from Iraq now, and 64 percent of women said that the war in Iraq has not improved U.S. security.
The Senate has a new high of 16 women and the House has a new high of at least 70, with a few races outstanding. Hillary’s big win will strengthen her presidential tentacles.
I’m still nervous about Hillary Clinton. Her “I have bigger balls than the rest of you dorks combined” style rubs me the wrong way. Also, I have the feeling political expediency tops her list of priorities. Why do some people like her so much? I don’t get it.
D.
I’m between cases at the moment.
Our general surgeon is predicting that my taxes will go up 20% under the new Democratically controlled Congress. To which I say: Yeah, baby! Bring it on!
I don’t believe it for a moment (the Dems aren’t so stupid as to trash their hard-fought victory by giving the Repugs fodder for ’08), but even if it were true, it would be a small price to pay for this victory.
We did it!
I am so happy my fears of stolen elections didn’tĂ‚Â pan out, butĂ‚Â we still need to be vigilantĂ‚Â regarding recount shenanigans in Montana and Virginia.Ă‚Â
D.
It’s a google bomb extravaganza. This explains it (kinda sorta).
Here’s an easy way to thank Keith Olbermann.
And, of course, the one time you have ever given us specifics about what you have kept us safe from, Mr. Bush — you got the name of the supposedly targeted Tower in Los Angeles… wrong.
Thus was it left for the previous President to say what so many of us have felt; what so many of us have given you a pass for in the months and even the years after the attack:
You did not try.
You ignored the evidence gathered by your predecessor.
You ignored the evidence gathered by your own people.
Then, you blamed your predecessor.
That would be the textbook definition… Sir, of cowardice.
(Full transcript at Crooks and Liars.)
Why thank the man? Because in a media circus crowded with cowards, it often seems that Keith is the only mensch.
D.
Republicans. Gotta love those sanctimonious, hypocritical, self-defeating bastards. With the Republicans working overtime to sabotage their chances in November, the Democrats will have to really sweat to, as Markos said recently, snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
The good part: Hypocrite Rep. Mark Foley (R) left an e-paper trail a mile long as he sent naughtygrams to a 16-year-old page.
The better part: “Top House Republicans knew for months about e-mail traffic between Representative Mark Foley and a former teenage page, but kept the matter secret and allowed Mr. Foley to remain head of a Congressional caucus on children’s issues, Republican lawmakers said Saturday.”
The bestest part: the 16-year-old was a guy. Election year dynamite! Here’s a snip from the messages — see for yourself. Would a man write these things to a 16-year-old girl?
Nastiness and schadenfreude below the cut.
Over at Tennessee Guerilla Woman, Egalia has Maureen Dowd’s latest piece, this one comparing humorist Sacha Baron Cohen’s Borat character (a misogynistic, antisemitic, and generally crude form of life) to Bush’n’CheneyCo. JurassicPork has breached the NY Times firewall as well. JP’s Friday roundup has a wealth of good stuff, and Egalia kept me reading for the last thirty minutes.
Read about Borat’s White House “visit” here. And from Reuters:
Secret Service agents turned away British comedian Sacha Baron Cohen, in character as the boorish, anti-Semitic journalist, when he tried to invite “Premier George Walter Bush” to a screening of his upcoming movie, “Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan.”
Also invited to the screening: O.J. Simpson, “Mel Gibsons” and other “American dignitaries.”
Cohen’s stunt was timed to coincide with an official visit by Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev, who is scheduled to meet with Bush on Friday.
Okay, gotta go edit me some romance.
LIVE BLOGGING TONIGHT at 8 PM PST, sooner if I can.
Y’all drop by.
D.
For those of you who are apolitical, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann for the last few weeks, has been channeling Edward R. Murrow in his (Olbermann’s) quest to take down this corrupt administration.
Tonight, Olbermann called Bush out for cowardice. Wow. Read the full transcript. Crooks and Liars will undoubtedly post a link to the video; I’ll crosslink here, when I get the opportunity.
But if politics doesn’t get you excited, meditate on the sunset 🙂
D.
UPDATE: Here’s some linkage at Daily Kos,Ă‚Â or go straight to Crooks and Liars.