Balls and Walnuts
more than you ever wanted to know
See, live bloggers? I didn’t make this up.
Macrophile: an individual (typically a man) who fantasizes about making love to big women. REALLY big women.
From Salon (so it has to be real):
You never forget your first glimpse of the Statue of Liberty. A towering monument to freedom, democracy and the big-girl aesthetic, she looms over New York Harbor, 225 tons of womanhood, 151 feet from toes to torch tip, her head high and huge, her massive bosom outthrust to welcome the tired, the poor, the huddled masses. For immigrants arriving on America’s shore, the statue is the earth mother of international acceptance. For macrophiles, she’s something else — the ultimate sex goddess.
With very little effort, you can find stories and photoshops of macrophilic fantasias. Here, this one is safe for work (provided you don’t have to explain to your boss why you’re looking at an image of a little man pretending to be toe jam). This one is not quite as safe for work. So that’s what happened to my missing Army Man!
Giantess stories abound (google ‘giantess’ or ‘gts’). I wonder if anyone has ever separated the good from the bad? This one caught my eye; it’s about Hillary Clinton (as First Lady — it was written in ’97) um . . . outgrowing the Lincoln Bedroom? Snip:
Hillary was extremely disappointed. She wanted no one to be as powerful as herself, especially a man. However, she still had grown to immense porportions, and possessed unreal strength. It was only natural that the inventor of this wonderful gene therapy would experiment on himself. For now. she’d have to settle for being second-best. For now anyway.
Can’t say I understand this particular fetish, but it is unique. And did you know there are men who fantasize about being eaten alive? Vorarephilia.
I’m beginning to think that if you can imagine something strange, anything strange, someone somewhere will find it arousing.
D.
Yeah, being a “short and stacked” man myself, I never understood the attraction to tall, leggy amazon women, much less the sexification of the “Attack of the 50 foot Woman” female iconography.
Maybe it’s an extrapollation of female empowerment? The little guys who like tall, dominant, powerful women take that fantasy to it’s craziest, most sexualized extreme?
I don’t understand. But then again, the whole scatology thing just baffles me as well. I’m not sure where caveman id crosses over to wanting to see women poo.
I think the whole Amazon thing is another manifestation of the female dominance fetish, which isn’t really a fetish, or even all that kinky. When you get right down to it, it’s not hard to understand at all. A hefty number of women have a similar bent, wherein they want to give up all control.
It makes sense: if the opposite-sex partner has power, a lot of power, then your orgasm is guilt-free, because it isn’t you who is making demands. It is the other person, and any sexual pleasure you get is incidental. For many people with responsibilities, this is an escape.
This is a pretty common fantasy for both sexes. Probably a little more common for women, because it’s more acceptable culturally, I think.
Rule 34 of the Internet: If it exists, there is porn of it.
Not quite… If you can imagine it, there is porn of it…
aw damn, MEL beat me to it. yeh, rule 34. it’s scary and true.
Oh, good lord. That link. Thomas the Tank Engine slash fiction?
I always was a little suspicious of Percy, and I think “Lady” doth protest too much (I’m checking her coal car, that’s all I’m saying).
Well, for another perspective on the Amazon thing, I had a teacher in high school who said that the Amazons weren’t really women but men who shaved. The ancient Greeks viewed clean-shaven men as women.
Which would explain a few things…
Then again, the same teacher was known to lie to us, presumably to see if anyone would figure it out. Or he just enjoyed messing with us.
Thus, we learned not to trust people in authority.