Balls and Walnuts
more than you ever wanted to know
Badge of honor
From Blue Gal and Cap’n Dyke,
You are a terrorist-loving, Bush-bashing, “blame America first”-crowd traitor. You are in league with evil-doers who hate our freedoms. By all counts you are a liberal, and as such cleary desire the terrorists to succeed and impose their harsh theocratic restrictions on us all. You are fit to be hung for treason! Luckily George Bush is tapping your internet connection and is now aware of your thought-crime. Have a nice day…. in Guantanamo!
For fun, try answering everything the way you would imagine George Bush would answer the questions. You’ll get the following message:
Congratulations, Patriot! Wave your flag proudly, stand tall, and bask in the glory of George Bush’s America. The terrorists will never win so long as there is a sufficient number of people like you out there. Never question, never doubt. You are on the right side. America’s side. God’s side. Rush Limbaugh has told you so. Rah rah, go Bush!!
Someone’s tongue is firmly in his cheek.
D.
Lol, I got 85% Terrorist, and that’s only because I had to say NO to having voted for Kerry. 😉
While the US wants to lead the world, they still don’t want the world to vote for their government.
I am so pissed that over half the respondents in today’s Alabama poll still think invading Iraq was the right thing to do. They barely disapprove of Bush’s handling of the war.
lookin’ for your 29%? They’re here.
I only scored 91%, but what do you expect from a Canadian?
Darn, only 89% – where did I go wrong?
LOL
I don’t know what’s wrong with this test – I only got a 96%. I wanna see Dubya hung for treason!
BG: it kinda reinforces the Alabama stereotype of the drooling, gap-toothed inbred, doesn’t it? The Cletii, as John Scalzi dubbed them, probably couldn’t find Iraq on a map, but they’re sure that all them Ay-rabs are mixed up in this whole thing.
Oh, I’m 98%. Which is heartening.
100% here too, Doug.
Y’know, I tried & tried to make a sarcastic &/or amusing comment here, but I just can’t today. It all makes me too angry. *sigh*
I’m at 98%, which is nice.
This might be an opportunity to flag up a couple of stonking* editorials in today’s Washington Post. Eugene Robinson on the way language has been twisted (in the phrase “War on Terror” he thinks that “on” might be OK…) and Richard Cohen on why Bin Laden has a better claim to have won than his enemies.
* stonking – Brit term indicating the highest praise possible, eg “That was a stonking free kick from Beckham in extra time.”