Monthly Archives: September 2006


And now, a health care advisory from Dr. Walnut

This Crystal Jelly Double Dong could be hazardous to your health.

(What? You want to know if the stuff below the cut is work safe?

Sure it is . . . assuming you work for Xandria.)
(more…)

Badge of honor

From Blue Gal and Cap’n Dyke,

Your ‘Do You Want the Terrorists to Win’ Score: 100%

You are a terrorist-loving, Bush-bashing, “blame America first”-crowd traitor. You are in league with evil-doers who hate our freedoms. By all counts you are a liberal, and as such cleary desire the terrorists to succeed and impose their harsh theocratic restrictions on us all. You are fit to be hung for treason! Luckily George Bush is tapping your internet connection and is now aware of your thought-crime. Have a nice day…. in Guantanamo!

Do You Want the Terrorists to Win?
Quiz Created on GoToQuiz

For fun, try answering everything the way you would imagine George Bush would answer the questions. You’ll get the following message:

Congratulations, Patriot! Wave your flag proudly, stand tall, and bask in the glory of George Bush’s America. The terrorists will never win so long as there is a sufficient number of people like you out there. Never question, never doubt. You are on the right side. America’s side. God’s side. Rush Limbaugh has told you so. Rah rah, go Bush!!

Someone’s tongue is firmly in his cheek.

D.

Post 9/11 America: it’s an Oddworld

A lone terrorist upsets the hegemonic powers that be. Explosions, destruction of government-run factories, assassinations abound.

Who is this terrorist — Osama bin Laden? Hardly. Meet Abe, a Mudokon. One race’s terrorist is another race’s messiah.

In the second Oddworld PC game, Abe’s Exoddus, Abe led 200 fellow Mudokons to freedom, meanwhile blowing up the factories and military facilities of the evil Glukkons. Abe does this by virtue of plucky determination, cleverness (thanks to you, the gamer who controls his every move), and “scary powers” — like the ability to possess and blow up his own farts.

Meet a Glukkon.

In Abe’s Exoddus, head Glukkons Phleg, Dripik, and Aslik meet periodically to discuss their problems with the terrorist Abe. One of them, Dripik I think, says to the other two, “Where you see disaster, I see opportunity.” That’s a Glukkon for you — always looking for the profit margin.

I often wonder if our government’s Glukkons had a similar meeting on 9/12/01. Did Dick Cheney tell George Bush, “Where you see disaster, I see opportunity”? Every one of our Glukkons seems to have seized on this moment of opportunity: Cheney to grab wealth (via Halliburton), Bush and Rove to seize power, Rumsfeld to launch his own private game of Army Men.

The analogy breaks down after that. Abe’s a hero, a messiah to his people, but the 9/11 terrorists (despite their own self-perceptions) were murderers, plain and simple. In the fictional Oddworld, good and evil are clearly defined. But in our own Oddworld, the distinctions of good and evil are blurred beyond all hope of clear perception. The Abes of our world may be murderers, but how should we view our own leaders, who through their vanity and ineptitude have caused the death or injury of thousands of individuals, American and otherwise?

I’m afraid we live in a world full of Glukkons. The rest of us are Mudokons, but, unlike Abe, our powers are limited.

D.

9/11/01: It didn’t have to change anything

On the morning of 9/11/01, a patient told me what had happened in New York City. I didn’t immediately believe him. Patients, especially the older ones, tell me lots of strange things. Not all of them are true, and this one in particular sounded unbelievable.

Between patients, I called Karen, and she confirmed the story. I didn’t see the footage until that evening. It still seemed unbelievable even after I watched the news. I felt like one of those cranks who refuses to believe in the Apollo moon landings. Surely this hadn’t happened.

At some level I began accepting the idea but I still kept it at a distance. I thought of it as I would a speculative fiction plot bunny. “Suppose it’s real. Suppose terrorists really did crash those planes,” and so forth. And I swear to you this is true: I wasn’t worried about what the terrorists would do next — I worried what George Bush would do next.

When it comes to politics, I’m not always right, but this time I was dead-on accurate.

The following thought is neither original nor particularly well-stated: the greatest damage to our country on 9/11/01 was that which was perpetrated upon us by our leaders. I saw it coming. I dreaded it. I knew the world had changed, knew it would take a strong and wise leader to weather the change, rise above it, and prevail; knew George Bush wasn’t that man.

I was wrong about some things. Frankly, I thought we would lose our civil liberties in a matter of weeks rather than months, and I didn’t expect the tide of public opinion to turn within the decade. Call me a pessimist.

9/11 didn’t have to change anything — not like this, at any rate. We could have learned from it. We could have led the world. We didn’t have to fuck everything up.

D.

Mad Libs LIVE

Michelle gave me a great suggestion. For the next live blog session, willing participants should email me a snip from their works-in-progress. Nothing too big, perhaps 100 to 200 words. I will Mad Lib-ify them and email them out to other would-be participants. Email me back your responses. When we get together for live blogging, I’ll read the results.

Let me know if I need to explain Mad Libs. Wait, here’s a link.

Back to editing. Sorry this place ain’t more lively.

Oh, you may need my email addy:

azureus

at harborside

dot

com

We’ll shoot for next Saturday night at 7 PST. And no, you don’t have to play to show up at the live blog session.

D.

Lobsterissimus bumbakissimus

Jim Donahue’s link to an Ernie Kovacs clip got me thinking about other comedians whom I know by reputation but not by direct experience. Kovacs was before my time, but what about Peter Cook and Dudley Moore?

We didn’t get much British TV when I was a kid. The Prisoner made it across the pond, as did Masterpiece Theater, and not much else. My first exposure to Cook and Moore came in my 20s, when I saw Bedazzled. Over the years, I’ve gotten bits and pieces of this duo, but never enough. I own Tragically, I was an Only Twin, but it’s not the same as seeing a live performance.

YouTube has a few clips. This one really grabbed me: Cook’s and Moore’s voices with chimp performers.

Jane Mansfield . . . who knew?

D.

Editing . . .

I’m more than halfway through my first read-through and really enjoying the story. Some time ago, I must have mentioned the fact that I write primarily to please myself. Consequently, I tend to love my own writing with a most unhealthy lack of objectivity.

So, so unprofessional. But here I am, giggling away at my own jokes.

Tammy, by the way, truly is a wicked wench. My wife was doing just fine reading my manuscript until we received the ARC for Tammy’s Valley of the Soul. Then Karen “got distracted.” Thanks, Tam.

Karen is easily distracted from my manuscript, particularly since she reads it not as romance but as autobiography. I can’t imagine what she means by that. I’m not tall, I don’t look a thing like Adam Sandler, and I’m an even better cook than Brad. But if she wants to act out scenes from the book with me, I’m game.

The question I’m mulling is how much to add to the manuscript. Karen thinks the relationship needs to play out over more time. As it presently reads, the whole thing is very much a whirlwind. Is this necessarily a bad thing? But the more I futz with the timeline, the more difficult my editing job will be.

Gotta think about it.

Time to go shopping.

***

Live blogging tonight, folks. Let’s shoot for 7 PM Pacific time. The weather cooled off some, so I doubt I’ll be topless this time. Sorry.

D.

Honesty, humor, and SERIOUS fiction

Only one point to make here, people: SERIOUS fiction (all caps because, you know, these literary fiction writers are SERIOUS, unlike us genre writers) does not have a monopoly on honesty.

I thought about this while listening to my new Gogol Bordello CD, Voi-La Intruder. The song is called “God-Like” and here are the first few stanzas:

You and I resemble god
made by him to come after him
everything in us resembles god
except for one thing

Everything in us resembles god
except for one thing.
Everything in us resembles god
except for one thing.

I am a liar you are a cheater
I am a thief and you are a traitor
I’m downright stupid
and you are paranoid
haha, there’s more than one

Well let’s just keep going, then;

When I screw
I don’t care for the beauty.
I drape myself over hands that are crooked

When I’m hurting myself
I just try to hurt you
you respond with tears
but they are never true

Read the rest of the lyrics here.

When I first listened to this song, I felt a strange pleasure rushing through me as I recognized that unique mixture of honesty and humor, something buoyed up from the well of emotion found in a real, loving-and-hating relationship. I realized that it doesn’t matter whether you’re writing lyrics, genre lit, or literary lit. If the honesty isn’t there, the writing is crap.

Remember these lyrics?

I need you, babe
To put through the shredder
In front of my friends
Ooooh Babe.
Dont leave me now.
How could you go?
When you know how I need you
To beat to a pulp on a Saturday night
Ooooh Babe.
How could you treat me this way?

Karen and I have always loved that song for its honesty. The protagonist is a creep, an abuser, but he’s honest enough to bare it all and expose himself to universal contempt. Also, as painful as this song is, black humor abounds.

I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest that humor can be taken as an index of honesty in writing. I’m not saying humorless writing is dishonest — but if the author hasn’t mined the humor from a situation, he hasn’t done the full job.

What do you think?

D.

Thirteen patients

Apropos of yesterday’s discussion, and in the absence of any other bright ideas, I thought I would remember a few patients today. We’ll begin with me and go from there.

1. Me. I loved my pediatrician, Dr. Johnson. I especially loved taking off all my clothes whether he asked me to or not. When I became 9 or 10, my parents decided I was too old for a pediatrician and switched me to their GP, a guy I never liked. There’s something wrong with a dude who thinks it’s necessary to give a kid a rectal exam every time he sees him. But did my mom ever question him on this? Nope. And did he bother to wipe away the lube afterwards? Nope. The bastard.

2. My first history and physical was on a VA patient, a Korean war vet in his 50s who looked like your typical Silicon Valley businessman. We were instructed to ask everything. EVERYthing. And it was embarrassing as hell for this young med student to take a sexual history, and somehow worse still to ask whether he did any illicit drugs.

Imagine my surprise when he told me he did a few lines of coke every weekend with his pals.

3. Not long after, I had another patient, a young man with Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome due to alcoholism. He was in his 30s but he looked 50, and the only word he could say was “Beer.” Ask him how he got here, and he would smile, shrug, and say, “Beer beer beer.” Kinda funny, but really very sad.

4. Another Wernicke-Korsakoff patient: funny thing, both this guy and patient #3 weren’t depressed about their conditions. I wonder if that’s part of the psychosis — if so, it’s a bit of a blessing. (Alzheimer’s patients, for example, are often extremely depressed in the early and mid stages of the condition — understandably.) Anyway, this was back during the first George Bush’s presidency. When we did a mental status eval, we would ask questions such as, “What year is it?” “What city are we in right now?” and “Who is the current president?”

On that last question, my patient responded, “President Bushwhack.”

Obviously of sound mental status, politically speaking. Made me wonder if he was faking the rest of it 😉

5. She wasn’t even my patient. But she was eleven, had a family who loved her, prayed for her at her bedside every day, left prayers for her written in Hebrew, and she died of meningococcal meningitis. Life really isn’t fair.

6. I took care of her lacerated scalp following a traffic accident and she became my private project from then on. She wanted a new nose, I gave her a new nose. She wanted Julia Roberts’ lips, I gave her Julia Roberts’ lips. In exchange, she dressed like a vamp and shared Madonna’s photography book with me, the one with the airbrushed anus.

Nothing ever happened between us, but I suspect we both thought about it.

7. Skip back to med school for a moment. She was a young mom with a loving husband and she had a nasty breast cancer. (Yes, they’re all bad, but some are worse than others.) She wanted my opinion: should she do chemo, or not? My usual protestation (I’m only a med student, I don’t have the knowledge base to answer that question) didn’t wash with her. She wanted to know, if I were her, would I do it?

She couldn’t ask her family or friends. They only wanted her to live, and they would have had her do anything to get those extra few percentage points’ chance of cure. She needed to ask an impartial individual.

I told her I’d do the chemo. I wanted her to live, too.

8. I would be remiss if I didn’t link back to my dos piernas story. Considering the fact I based my romance on a real event (a med student who couldn’t manage to place a urinary catheter), that dos piernas story could probably inspire a trilogy.

9. During internship, every call night the nurses asked me to push Dilantin on Mr. M. He had been unresponsive since the mid-70s; for the past 17 years, all he ever did was grunt in response to pain. Every so often, he would get pneumonia or a bed sore and find his way back to County.

His head looked like a basketball that had seen too many decades on an inner city ball court. Scarred, patched, a war zone unto itself. He was a bull of a man, too. His family kept him well-fed through that feeding tube.

During the last month of my internship, he woke up, just snapped out of it wanting to know where he was, what had happened. I can’t begin to imagine his or his family’s emotions, but for us docs who had taken care of him, it was eery. He seemed like a time traveler . . . and, you know? We didn’t know whether to be happy or sad for him.

10. Flash forward five years. When I was one month out of training, this patient came to see me in the private practice office asking for a third opinion. Two ENTs had told her she needed sinus surgery: the self-perceived ‘top sinus surgeon of LA County’, and one of the top academic sinus surgeons in the area. All I knew was that she’d had an abnormal finding on her sinus CT, discovered when she’d had a head CT for her headaches.

So she had seen some of the best talent in the area and they both agreed she needed surgery. What could I possibly add to this discussion?

I took one look at her CT scan and started laughing. She didn’t need surgery — she just needed an honest ENT. Her only abnormality was a maxillary sinus mucus retention cyst. These are incredibly common and rarely symptomatic.

Moral: don’t hesitate to get those second (and third) opinions, people.

11. You occasionally save lives in medicine — it’s inevitable — but you don’t expect to forget the patients you save. She approached me in a local restaurant, said, “Are you . . . are you Dr. Hoffman?” I’m thinking, What did I do wrong now? Nothing, it turns out. I had ordered an MRI scan on her five years ago and discovered her benign (but life-threatening) tumor. I’d changed her life. And now, I didn’t even recognize her.

12. Sometimes you know in your bones that it’s bad. The sound of a patient’s voice, or a constellation of symptoms that can only mean one thing. Worst of all is when the patient is a child and you hope you’re wrong but you know you’re not.

One came in soon enough that a prompt diagnosis made a difference.

One didn’t.

13. He had a terrible diagnosis, the worst. The one that kills you within a month no matter what you do — surgery, chemo, radiation, this tumor laughs at everything and grows. And grows.

I brought him and his family into the office and told them everything. I asked my patient if he had any unsettled family business, like estranged family members he should square with. He didn’t, but he did have a son in Europe in the military. I wrote a letter. We faxed it to the son’s C.O. If I remember correctly, his son was back home within the week.

He died soon thereafter, as expected. There was nothing I or any other doctor could do about it. And yet I feel more pride in that case than in anything else I’ve ever done in medicine.

Leave a message in the comments, and I’ll give you some cool linky love below.

Kate’s 13 favorite pictures

Darla’s beautiful and neurotic mind

Trish’s 13 in-yo-faces

Technorati tag:

D.

Is that an otoscope in your pocket, or are you just glad to see me?

In response to the first few hundred words of my novel’s opening scene, Caltha writes:

That’s just gross. Is it supposed to be gross? I understand it’s supposed to be funny, but I’m sorry, the subject just bothers me too much. You claimed to be sensitive in a previous post, but obviously not sensitive to the suffering of this young woman. She is in an extremely vulnerable position and moaning in pain, and you just make fun of her and let your hero regard her as nothing but a pice of meat? That’s just sad and bothering. If any doctors are anything like that it’s not the subject of comedy and they shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near female patients. And just fyi, I don’t consider myself sensitive and I laugh at most kinds of sick humour, but the way the young woman is treated in this piece of text is just too sad.

Is the opening gross? Insensitive? Is Brad mistreating his patient, as Caltha suggests? I don’t think so, but I’m willing to listen to arguments.

I intended the opening to be uncomfortable for readers who aren’t accustomed to thinking of their doctors as sexual animals. I want those readers to snap out of their blinkered view, and I want them to do it quickly. The novel focuses on the suppressed sexuality of the hero and heroine, as well as their development as doctors. This suppression pops up (literally) at inopportune moments for Brad; Lori, on the other hand, isn’t even willing to admit to herself that she’s a virgin. If I’m exploring their sexual and emotional growth, the last thing I want to do is ignore their sexuality.

(more…)

Next page →
← Previous page