About Walnut



View all posts by Walnut

Quick shout (politics)

. . . to Jeff Huber for a fine run-down of the Friday news. Thanks to NaNoWriMo and that other time-consuming November activity, MyDamnedJob-o, I don’t get to surf the news as much as I would like. Thanks to Jeff, I don’t have to!

High points:

*Pennsylvania Congressman John Murtha, a Vietnam vet and retired Marine colonel, has called for the withdrawal of all American troops within the next six months. Speaker Dennis Hastert’s response:

“They would prefer that the United States surrender to terrorists who would harm innocent Americans,” Mr. Hastert said.

Ah, the sweet, sweet sound of squawking chickenhawks. Read the NY Times story here. While you’re at it, check out Jurassic Pork’s commentary, too.

*Renewal of the Orwellian Patriot Act may not see smooth sailing, thanks to a possible Democratic filibuster. We have Russ Feingold to thank for this (from the NY Times story):

“This is worth the fight,” Senator Russell D. Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat who serves on the Judiciary Committee, said in an interview.

“I’ve cleared my schedule right up to Thanksgiving,” Mr. Feingold said, adding that he was making plans to read aloud from the Bill of Rights as part of a filibuster if necessary.

Go for it, Senator Feingold! Hell, make all the bastards miss Turkey Day. It’s worth it, all right.

***

Shout for my wife:

Karen has written an interesting post on her late father’s rather odd past. His life story seems like something out of Vonnegut (a la Mother Night) or John Irving. Check it out.

D.

Technorati tags: , ,

Who’s my fugwy wittle Secwetawy of State, hmm?

Props to Pat for finding the Condoleeza Rice is Ugly blog. The goal of this site:

“Here at Condoleeza Rice Is Ugly, we feel that our Secretary of State has received far less parody and hostility than other major players in the Bush adminstration. The time has come to mock with equality.”

An honorable purpose indeed, and yet I fear this blog will bring out the trolls, racists, and misogynists of the ‘osphere. Condoleeza Rice is Ugly seems to invite the Least Common Denominator of humor. For that reason alone, I’m going to reserve judgment. As you all know, I like my humor to be witty to the point of erudition.

And that is why, for my contribution, I made a poopy joke.

D.

Technorati tag: ,

Early morning driftwood

Remember how vibrator afficionado walking neocon talking point ripe dingleberry TV commentator Bill O’Reilly recently smeared the people of San Francisco for exercising their right of political dissent?

“If Al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we’re not going to do anything about it.”

Now, O’Reilly’s trying to wriggle out of his mean, nasty, beady-eyed comment by claiming the uproar was due to “far left internet smear sites.” He wants to honor the memory of his hero, Joseph McCarthy, by publishing a blacklist of these sites: “Now we can all know who was with the anti-military Internet crowd. We’ll post the names of all who support the smear merchants on billoreilly.com.”

Arianna Huffington wants to help. If you’d like to be added to Bill O’Reilly’s enemies list, click here. Sure, it’s symbolic, but if it helps Arianna goad Bill, I’m all for it.

***

Phone call from the Emergency Room at 1:30AM.

“Hello, Dr. Hoffman?”

“Yeah.”

“Sorry. We called you in error.”

“What?”

“We called you in error.” Click.

***

One last thought about dreams:

Over the years, I’ve had several dreams which provided worthwhile images for fiction. Not stories, mind you; those invariably suck. (Each time, I would wake up thinking, “Wow, what a story!” but within a half hour, the glee has faded, and I can’t imagine why I found the tale so captivating.) But the images: crisp and dripping with archetype, screaming to be incorporated into a short story or novel.

As I was driving in this morning, I thought about the stories I’ve written which used those images. None of them has been published. This failing, I think, has nothing to do with the images, but with the additional crap I’ve layered over them.

Here’s an example. Several years ago, I dreamed about a trio of white explorers who conspired to witness a native ritual forbidden to outsiders (a la Sir Richard Burton). In this ritual, the tribesmen wore huge, brightly painted papier mache heads meant to represent their old gods. Thus adorned, they would dance and parade for hours as they climbed to the mouth of an inactive volcano. There they would fling the heads down into the volcano and race back to the city, unencumbered by their old gods.

In the dream, the explorers are discovered, and they are thrown into the volcano, fake heads and all.

I love two things about that image: first, the notion of shedding one’s superstitions in such a graphic way, and second, the idea that the explorers (representing the more wicked aspects of the modern world) would be shed with equal joy.

When I wrote the story, however, I added a bunch of crap about missionaries with a phony religion based on corporate-American ethics and baseball (their martyr was pelted to death with hardballs after delivering his famous Sermon on the Mound). Killer of killers, I fell back on one of Strange Horizons’ notorious “plots we see too often”: my villain was crazy, and much of what he imagined in the course of the story turned out to be either delusion or dream.

Feh. I should start over from scratch and pare it back to the core image . . . once NaNoWriMo is over and done with.

***

One of these days, we should all take a look at that Strange Horizons page and come up with a list of counterexamples: stories that incorporated these trite plots and did so with spectacular results.

Someone once said to me, “Things are trite because they work.” Trick is to make the trite feel fresh . . .

D.

Dream a little dream

Jona has been messing around with her dreams lately, trying her best to remember them. Sounds innocent enough, huh? BUT (cue scary organ music) that’s how it starts. Dreams are a risky business, but I’m not sure any of you will believe me. (more…)

A liberally dirty joke

Long O.R. day today, plus two trips to the ER, so I find myself short on energy, creativity, and time. Soon, I hope to write a post on this little feller,

the blue poison dart frog, Dendrobates azureus. Hard to believe I’ve been blogging since April and I’ve made scarcely a mention of our frogs.

Maybe later. For now, here’s a joke I heard in the O.R. today. Stop me if you’ve heard this one.

Um . . . any of you who are still in that 36%-who-still-like-George-Bush demographic might want to sit this one out. (more…)

Ox tail stew for the muse

How’s that for a book title? Forget chicken soup; even the best leaves me hungry. Ox tail stew, on the other hand, is the quintessential meal in a bowl. Give the muse a bit of metaphorical ox tail stew and she’ll be good for a week. (more…)

Alien psychology

In case you missed it, PBW had a wonderful post on the “don’ts” of writing fiction (Paperback Writer: How Not To). Pearls galore. Some time soon, I hope to blog on my own list of don’ts.

In the comments, one of F. O’Brien Andrew’s “don’ts” struck me. Paraphrasing: in science fiction, make your aliens physically bizarre but psychologically human. This is a don’t, mind you.

This is an interesting “don’t” because it gets at the root of an interesting dichotomy in the science fiction audience. Some folks read SF exclusively for the wow factor. These readers go into ecstasies over authors who can deliver extraterrestrials who are alien body and soul. (more…)

Jews to the right of me, Jews to the left of me

New York Times Op-Ed columnist David Brooks might tick me off as an Op-Ed guy, but he writes a provocative book review. In the November 6 NYT Book Review, he looks at Jerome Karabel’s scholarly work, The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton.

Karabel’s book focuses on a quiet revolution which occurred on Ivy League campuses over the course of the 20th century. In the early 1900s, non-White Anglo-Saxon Protestants didn’t bother to apply to these schools; yet “Jews, for reasons that are not clear, never got the message. They applied to Harvard, Yale and Princeton even though they weren’t really wanted. And because many were so academically qualified, they increasingly got in.” (more…)

I’ll take a winged Eros, please

You think I’m lazy? Me, lazy? We did this last night:


The Piledriver from Sexual Positions Free.Com

. . . and we used real wooden mannequins.

Somehow, sex looks more fun when genitalia-free mannequins get it on. Rent the uncut version of Team America and tell me I’m wrong.

D.

Ubersexual — so that’s what I am!

Thanks to Beth for pointing me towards Sandy Oakes’s Romancing the Blog post, Ubersexuals. At last, I find someone who understands my true nature.

Let’s see how I stack up. According to Marsha Saltzman’s book The Future of Men, the Ubersexual

  • “embraces his masculine qualities (the M-ness factor) which includes confidence, leadership, passion and compassion.” Yup, that’s me, all the way. Just ask Karen.
  • “is passionate about causes and principles.” Check.
  • “treats and respects women as equals, but considers other men his best friends.” But my wife is my best friend. Does that make me (gasp!) a metrosexual? Am I less uber for my choice in friends?
  • “is sensual and not self-conscious.” Sensual, yes, but . . . does worrying about my belly blubber count as self-consciousness?
  • “knows ‘the difference between right and wrong and will make the right decision regardless of what others around him may think.'” Check.

By my conservative estimate, this makes me at least 70% ubersexual. That’s good enough to overturn a Presidential veto — ubersexual it is! Yippee. This sounds like a good (albeit vaguely Third Reichich) thing.

One problem: I don’t like being on top. Does that make me an untersexual?

D.

Next page →
← Previous page