{"id":273,"date":"2005-10-05T20:26:00","date_gmt":"2005-10-06T04:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/?p=273"},"modified":"2006-03-25T13:31:30","modified_gmt":"2006-03-25T21:31:30","slug":"nytbr-odds-and-ends","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/?p=273","title":{"rendered":"NYTBR Odds and Ends"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve never been a big fan of Robert Heinlein (I think I hit the limit with Stranger in a Strange Land), but it&#8217;s nearly impossible to read SF without becoming aware of Heinlein&#8217;s influence. He&#8217;s a controversial figure. Over the years, folks have accused him of being sexist, racist, fascist, you name it.<\/p>\n<p>In this week&#8217;s New York Times Book Review back page essay, author M.G. Lord argues that Heinlein&#8217;s earlier work qualifies him as a feminist (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/10\/02\/books\/review\/02lord.html\">Heinlein&#8217;s Female Troubles, NYTBR 10\/2\/05<\/a>). It&#8217;s an interesting (and well written) essay, and I encourage you folks to take a look at it, even if you are not SF fans.<\/p>\n<p>Elsewhere in the NYTBR: Eric Weinberger reviews George Saunders&#8217; The Brief and Frightening Reign of Phil without ever using the words science and fiction in close proximity of one another. The plot is plainly SF (um . . . all the action takes place on another planet, and concerns a variety of weird aliens), so what&#8217;s up? Weinberger chooses to call it satire.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t know if I have a problem with this.<\/p>\n<p>I asked Karen yesterday, &#8220;When are you going to blog again?&#8221; Since we&#8217;re an old married couple, she heard me when I telepathically added, &#8220;You know, you&#8217;ll never build your readership if you only blog once a week.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not blogging to get more readers,&#8221; she said. &#8220;I do it to help organize my thoughts.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I suppose that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m doing right now &#8212; trying to figure out how I feel about this. As SF writers, should we cheer when one of our own gets reviewed in the NYTBR, even if the SF-word isn&#8217;t used? Should we give Margaret Atwood a big stage wink <a href=\"http:\/\/urchin.earth.li\/cgi-bin\/twic\/wiki\/view.pl?page=MargaretAtwoodVsSF\">when she slams science fiction<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p>Okay, Romance lovers: do you have a Margaret Atwood in your ranks, i.e., an author who aspires towards the literary and shuns the Romance label, even though that&#8217;s exactly what she is writing? How do you feel about her? (Or him. As <a href=\"http:\/\/wenlock.blogspot.com\">Stephen<\/a> has taught me, there&#8217;s a few blokes out there.)<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s what I think. Although some science fiction novels are written purely for escapism, many authors are writing social commentary. Hell, a good novel can do both. Just because the author has something to say &#8212; as Atwood did in The Handmaid&#8217;s Tale &#8212; the novel should not automatically pass Go, collect $200, and rate as satire (don&#8217;t nobody say SF).<\/p>\n<p>If &#8220;genre&#8221; has any utility at all, it&#8217;s to help the reader know what to expect. To me, &#8220;serious literary fiction&#8221; is, <a href=\"http:\/\/pjohanneson.blogspot.com\/2005\/09\/yes-but-is-it-art.html\">as I mentioned to Pat recently<\/a>, &#8220;boring pointless stories about characters with boring pointless lives who, in their inevitable epiphanies, find meaning in said lives.&#8221; The last thing I want is for a bunch of truly excellent SF writers to worm their way into the ranks of those literary doofuses. Because, you know something? If they do, I&#8217;m not reading them any more.<\/p>\n<p>Thank heavens <a href=\"http:\/\/dshoffman.blogspot.com\/2005\/06\/lethem-on-chandler.html\">Jonathan Lethem&#8217;s Gun, with Occasional Music<\/a> was filed in SF. That&#8217;s all I&#8217;m saying.<\/p>\n<p>D.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve never been a big fan of Robert Heinlein (I think I hit the limit with Stranger in a Strange Land), but it&#8217;s nearly impossible to read SF without becoming aware of Heinlein&#8217;s influence. He&#8217;s a controversial figure. Over the years, folks have accused him of being sexist, racist, fascist, you name it. In this&hellip; <a class=\"continue\" href=\"https:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/?p=273\">Continue Reading NYTBR Odds and Ends<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,15,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-273","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books-n-authors","category-such-as-it-is","category-writers-life","radius"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=273"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=273"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=273"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ballsandwalnuts.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}