Category Archives: Writer’s Life


Editing update and a quote source

Lest you think I’ve been a lazy boy: yes, I’ve been working on my big mothah manuscript. My NaNo month left me a bit rusty as regards my novel, so I started over from scratch. I met and passed the 1/8 mark just a moment ago. Yippee!

Thumbnail description of The Brakan Correspondent, for those of you who aren’t intimately familiar with it already:

A respected newspaper journalist’s quest for the truth pits him against imperialistic aliens, his oppressive government, and cannon-wielding semi-intelligent pigs.

Sucks, doesn’t it? I prefer the blurb I gave over at pbw’s site once upon a time:

(more…)

Interlude

One of those weeks.

I’d wanted to blog last night, but I had to go in to see someone who didn’t want to see me, and . . . well, doctor-patient confidentiality must be respected.

I don’t think it’s unrelated that I dreamed last night of throwing it all in. “Let’s sell everything and move down to Mexico,” I told Karen in the dream, and amazingly, she went for it.

Next thing I knew, we were packing up for the move. We must have gotten rid of a lot of our junk, since we managed to fit everything into one of the smaller U-haul trucks. I felt exhausted that we were moving AGAIN, but I also felt exhilarated. I’m a wandering Jew at heart, and I’d been in one place far too long. We were moving on.

Then a wasp flew into my ear and I had that awful plugged sensation layered with batshit-crazy hindbrain terror whenever it buzzed its wings, and the dream became a nightmare, just like any other nightmare. And then I woke up.

Well, at least the sea is still as pretty as ever.

D.

Have a Sparky, Snarky Christmas

Lon Prater and Suzan L. Wiener at The Writers’ Ezine (Dec 05) have been kind enough to give us holiday gift ideas for the writer in your life. But ask yourself: does that writer really need much for Christmas? Take my advice and save your money. Limitless quiet time to write – that’s all he* wants for Christmas. Add in occasional reminders to bathe, eat, and take potty breaks, and you’ve given him more than he deserves.

Undoubtedly, you will see many such lists in the coming weeks. But who remembers the family of those lucky writers? Here at Balls and Walnuts, we do.

(more…)

Maundering

  1. To talk incoherently or aimlessly.
  2. To move or act aimlessly or vaguely; wander.

At some point in my daily blogsurf, I found a place where the host features a word-of-the-day (or was it a word-of-the-week?) Hopefully, she’ll stop by, because I can’t remember how I found her.

As you all know, there are way too few blogs in the world, so I’ve been thinking about inaugurating another. More on that later.

You’ll notice a few changes around Shatter:

  • New favorites! Yeah, I keep meaning to update these every week . . .
  • Shameless self-promotion gives links to the two stories of mine that are available on the ‘net. They also happen to be two that I’m proud of, or at least, I don’t cringe when I reread them. “The Mechanic,” in particular, is worth a quick check.
  • A new image for my better half’s occasional blog, Chelicera. I figure I’ve broken down Beth’s phobia enough to put up a really tiny and really, really cute REAL spider. Really!
  • New meters for The Brakan Correspondent edit and my NaNoWriMo NiP, Get Well Soon.
  • Linkage to new pal Blue Gal.

By the way: if you’d like me to link to you, drop me a line (a reply to this post will do).

***

I have blog envy. It’s the Type A in me. I’m envious of the group blogs that attract huge followings . . . I mean, look at Boing Boing. Why are they so popular? And why can’t I do the same thing?

We. Think Group. We.

If any of my regulars are interested in brainstorming this in email-space, please kick off a discussion in the comments, or just plain email me. I even thought up a great name for the blog:

Balls and Walnuts

What do you think? It has a mellifluous Crooks and Liars feel to it. (God and Consequences does too, but that one’s taken ;o) Naturally, once we all team up, we’ll choose a name all democratic-like.

As for theme . . . how about a political blog? I don’t see too many of those around. I think it may be an unfilled niche!

D.

NaNoWrapUp

What I learned after 50,000+ words:

1. It took me 47,000 words to figure out what my story was about,

2. 32,000 words (or so) to realize I had no villain, and

3. the first 1,666 words to see that this whole thing was, indeed, possible.

On the one hand, I increased my average productivity fourfold. On the other, the quality isn’t comparable to The Brakan Correspondent . . . but Get Well Soon isn’t total crap, either.

My favorite bit so far: when my villain asks my protagonist the rhetorical question, “Do I look like an asshole?” my protagonist (who isn’t human, but has a fondness for synthetic human prostitutes — cyborgs, essentially) thinks to himself that he had seen his share of assholes, they really were quite cute, and, no, this fellow wasn’t half as goodlooking as your average asshole.

That should give you an idea of the overall caliber of this story ;o)

A fun, clever, and exciting finish eludes me, but even with TBC, I didn’t have all the details worked out until the very end.

D.

NaNoSchlomo

I had a distant cousin Schlomo, long dead, who was such a bastard that all his kids left the farm and the religion. Seems he drove them a wee bit too hard. NaNoWriMo has become my Schlomo. Some thoughts:

1. Yes, I think I’m going to make it to 50,000. 7000 words in five days? Piece of cake. But that’s not the point. The point is,

2. When you emphasize quantity over quality, you get trite material. My muse keeps falling back on stock images and characters. I’ve tried to compensate for this by setting my story in a make believe society that yearns to be like Earth, Hollywood-style, but the lack of originality is really starting to gall me. Muse, are you listening? Give me something really weird tomorrow, or . . . or . . . I’m airing all your dirty laundry on this blog. I mean it. And another thing,

3. Why must you make the plot ever more tortuous? How am I going to unknot this beast? I purposefully chose a single first person POV to keep your smorgasbord tendencies in check. And what do you do? You keep wrapping my protag in ever more layers of intrigue. This would be fine if the intrigue were truly intriguing, but see #2.

Grrr. No, it’s not crap, but I have serious doubts as to whether it will be publishable in any form. TBC, my numero uno NiP — that’s a keeper, provided I can find someone willing to do a Golden Age on it. (John C. Wright gave his publisher a whopping HUGE first novel. They chopped it into three separate books and marketed each one separately.) But, Get Well Soon? It’ll be one of those novels that gets released when I’m as prolific and well sold as Stephen King, and my publisher says, “Oh, please oh please oh please, give us anything, even your funkiest piece of crap.”

So. NaNoScrewYou is a good thing why?

D.

Technorati tag:

The Gorjun is . . . um . . . riding a giant vibrator?


Boo-yah (or, as my ten-year-old says whenever he wins a game of chess*, “Huzzah!”) My first non-electronic publication, which is to say PRINT publication, is in PRINT, in Continuum Science Fiction, a PRINT science fiction magazine.

“The Gorjun is Free” is a story about a dysfunctional family, an alien artifact that looks like speckled poop, and several not-so-random changes to the fundamental constants of the universe. Former title, “All Change”, which no one liked but me.

So I’m leafing through, admiring the speckled poop illustration**, when I noticed this eye-popping breach of Strunk and White:

Like any true wonder, I couldn’t take my eyes away.

The opening phrase refers not to the sentence’s subject, but to the object of the narrator’s gaze. Well, you can bet I’m not going to read any further.

Other neat stuff: Editor Bill Rupp put my story first, wham, right there on page 2. In the table of contents, my story and byline are in larger font than the other stories. You would think I had a hand in the editing.

D.

*Yes, we are all geeks in the Hoffman household.

**In fairness, I did describe the artifact that way . . . but, did the artist have to take me so seriously?

Early morning driftwood

Remember how vibrator afficionado walking neocon talking point ripe dingleberry TV commentator Bill O’Reilly recently smeared the people of San Francisco for exercising their right of political dissent?

“If Al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we’re not going to do anything about it.”

Now, O’Reilly’s trying to wriggle out of his mean, nasty, beady-eyed comment by claiming the uproar was due to “far left internet smear sites.” He wants to honor the memory of his hero, Joseph McCarthy, by publishing a blacklist of these sites: “Now we can all know who was with the anti-military Internet crowd. We’ll post the names of all who support the smear merchants on billoreilly.com.”

Arianna Huffington wants to help. If you’d like to be added to Bill O’Reilly’s enemies list, click here. Sure, it’s symbolic, but if it helps Arianna goad Bill, I’m all for it.

***

Phone call from the Emergency Room at 1:30AM.

“Hello, Dr. Hoffman?”

“Yeah.”

“Sorry. We called you in error.”

“What?”

“We called you in error.” Click.

***

One last thought about dreams:

Over the years, I’ve had several dreams which provided worthwhile images for fiction. Not stories, mind you; those invariably suck. (Each time, I would wake up thinking, “Wow, what a story!” but within a half hour, the glee has faded, and I can’t imagine why I found the tale so captivating.) But the images: crisp and dripping with archetype, screaming to be incorporated into a short story or novel.

As I was driving in this morning, I thought about the stories I’ve written which used those images. None of them has been published. This failing, I think, has nothing to do with the images, but with the additional crap I’ve layered over them.

Here’s an example. Several years ago, I dreamed about a trio of white explorers who conspired to witness a native ritual forbidden to outsiders (a la Sir Richard Burton). In this ritual, the tribesmen wore huge, brightly painted papier mache heads meant to represent their old gods. Thus adorned, they would dance and parade for hours as they climbed to the mouth of an inactive volcano. There they would fling the heads down into the volcano and race back to the city, unencumbered by their old gods.

In the dream, the explorers are discovered, and they are thrown into the volcano, fake heads and all.

I love two things about that image: first, the notion of shedding one’s superstitions in such a graphic way, and second, the idea that the explorers (representing the more wicked aspects of the modern world) would be shed with equal joy.

When I wrote the story, however, I added a bunch of crap about missionaries with a phony religion based on corporate-American ethics and baseball (their martyr was pelted to death with hardballs after delivering his famous Sermon on the Mound). Killer of killers, I fell back on one of Strange Horizons’ notorious “plots we see too often”: my villain was crazy, and much of what he imagined in the course of the story turned out to be either delusion or dream.

Feh. I should start over from scratch and pare it back to the core image . . . once NaNoWriMo is over and done with.

***

One of these days, we should all take a look at that Strange Horizons page and come up with a list of counterexamples: stories that incorporated these trite plots and did so with spectacular results.

Someone once said to me, “Things are trite because they work.” Trick is to make the trite feel fresh . . .

D.

Ox tail stew for the muse

How’s that for a book title? Forget chicken soup; even the best leaves me hungry. Ox tail stew, on the other hand, is the quintessential meal in a bowl. Give the muse a bit of metaphorical ox tail stew and she’ll be good for a week. (more…)

Alien psychology

In case you missed it, PBW had a wonderful post on the “don’ts” of writing fiction (Paperback Writer: How Not To). Pearls galore. Some time soon, I hope to blog on my own list of don’ts.

In the comments, one of F. O’Brien Andrew’s “don’ts” struck me. Paraphrasing: in science fiction, make your aliens physically bizarre but psychologically human. This is a don’t, mind you.

This is an interesting “don’t” because it gets at the root of an interesting dichotomy in the science fiction audience. Some folks read SF exclusively for the wow factor. These readers go into ecstasies over authors who can deliver extraterrestrials who are alien body and soul. (more…)

Next page →
← Previous page