Stay with me to the end — you’ll be glad you did.
***
I have a devil of a time inventing fresh ways of saying the same old thing. How many different ways can I say, “Nemara took flight”? After a while, it gets to be a real challenge, especially when I exclude passive constructions (“. . . and Nemara was airborne”).
More troubling still is the challenge of coming up with eye-poppingly fresh word combinations. Hard enough to avoid trite phrasing, but innovation? That’s work. And yet, that’s just the sort of thing which makes readers (and, I hope, agents, editors, and publishers) love a writer. How do I make my brain do that?
Callou, callay, it’s Smart Bitches Day!
Casting about for motivation for your main character? Is she looking for wit, wealth, or wicked good looks in her man?
Nope. What she really wants is a top-notch gene donor. Brains and beauty are indicators of high quality DNA, and wealth should improve the chances that their many babies will survive and breed unto the next generation.
So goes the theory of daddy-daughter team David and Nanelle Barash, who last year released their sociobiological interpretation of literature, Madame Bovary’s Ovaries. Sexual selection, a key element of Darwinism and a centerpiece of the Barashes’ thesis, refers to traits which may not necessarily be adaptive but help to attract mates. Think about a peacock’s iridescent tail feathers, which attract peahens and predators alike. Think about Porsches and Beamers and big fat gold chains hanging on the necks of certain rappers.
Not that any of you would be that shallow.
In some instances, the Barash method yields fresh ways of looking at things. From Denis Dutton’s Washington Post review:
. . . discriminating human females are central to the world of Jane Austen, whom the Barashes call “the poet laureate of female choice.†Selecting a good mate is Austen’s major theme. She is particularly adept at bringing out, against the vast intricacies of a social milieu, the basic values women seek in men, and men tend to want in women (shortlist: good looks, health, money, status, IQ, courage, dependability and a pleasant personality — in many different weightings and orderings). Not being a peacock, Mr. Darcy does not have iridescent feathers, but for human females his commanding personality, solid income, intelligence, generosity, and the magnificent Pemberley estate do very nicely.
Madame Bovary’s Ovaries has its flaws, which Dutton’s review illuminates nicely. I encourage you to read the whole thing. But it occurred to me that, flawed or not, the premise of Darwinian motivation for literary characters has, at the very least, comic merit.
A few ideas:
What’s that? No romance in that last one? Well, how about this. Our perp has been at it for the last 25 years. Unbeknownst to her, her handsome young defense lawyer is actually her son! And she falls for him! We’ll call it Oedipus 2020.
Yeah, you’re right. I don’t understand the romance genre at all.
D.
Someone or something stalks the boys and young men of the Reach, kidnapping them, abusing them in the worst ways, killing them, and discarding their mutilated bodies. Dubric Byerly must find the killer and bring him to justice. He’s accompanied by his squire, Dien, his pages, Lars and Otlee, and the ghosts of all who have been murdered during his watch.
Threads of Malice follows Ghosts in the Snow, Tamara Siler Jones’s first Dubric Byerly novel. Since I’m fated never to read a series in the appropriate order, I started with Threads. It’s a credit to Jones’s characterization skills that Dubric and his comrades sprang to life for me within the first twenty-five pages. No backstory, by the way — scarcely a peep about what happened in Ghosts — and yet Dubric, Dien, and the boys captured and held my attention from the start.
Jones has horrible things in store for this foursome. If I remember correctly, PBW likes to ask her main characters, “What’s the worst thing I can do to you?” — and then, she does just that. I suspect Jones did the same thing when she conceived Threads of Malice, only she must have been having a bad day. I mean, a really, really bad day, because man, is she ever cruel to her characters.
What an incredible one-two punch this is: deft characterization plus Jones’s willingness to tighten the screws far past what would be acceptable among polite sadomasochists. Repeatedly, I found myself thinking, Oh, no she wouldn’t, she wouldn’t . . . I can’t believe it, she DID! She pulled very few punches indeed. As a result, I ripped through this book in a week, which is light speed for yours truly.
I cared deeply for these characters, and, yeah, I admit it: she made me cry. Y’all know what a crybaby I am (Sheila, you got me in StarDoc — damn you!) but still. A writer has to have a good deal of competence to turn on my waterworks. I’m impressed.
This novel features gruesome torture-murders, nasty-nasty autopsy scenes, slimy critters that bring to mind the best stomach-churning images from Martin Cruz Smith’s Arkady Renko novels, and two love stories: something for everyone.
I can only fault Jones on one thing: she keeps the pressure on almost until the very last page. Although the ending wrapped up the plot, I wanted a longer cool-down period, a chance to live with the characters during the aftermath. I want to know what happens next to these guys! Do I really have to wait until Fall 2006 for Valley of the Soul? This woman’s cruelty knows no bounds.
I’m sounding like a fanboy, huh?
D.
Know what I remember from the Ancient European Civ class I took in college?
Eureka = Oyreka!
The boy and I had a good day together in Eureka. True, the neat-o store on 2nd Street which sold carnivorous plants, glass eyes, and faded sepia-toned photographs has closed. It’s a Persian rug store now. Aside from that, however, we had a great day.
The boy and I did lunch at Hurricane Kate’s, where, on the way to the bathroom, I overheard the dishwasher belting out Rod Stewart‘s If You Want My Body and You Think I’m Sexy at the top of his lungs. Yet another food service employee with aspirations towards American Idol.
After lunch, we went shopping for birthday presents —
KAREN, IF YOU’RE READING THIS, STOP NOW!
for Karen, and Valentine’s Day candies too, for good measure. We made a trip to Borders and bought:
For me, Tamara Siler Jones’s Ghosts in the Snow (hey, if I can read PBW’s StarDoc series backwards, I can read Tambo’s Dubric novels out of sequence, too!)
For Jake (think homeschooling), Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying, Vonnegut’s Mother Night, and The Complete Short Stories of Mark Twain.
For Karen (and me, I admit it): a collection of John Varley’s short stories, and Maureen Dowd’s Are Men Necessary? That one’s a birthday present — she doesn’t know about it yet.
Jake wanted to get something for Mom that was HIS idea, so we went back to Old Town Eureka, found another gift shop, and Jake picked out a cool tee-shirt with a crane on it, while I lingered over a pack of Rider-Waite tarot cards. I’ll save my tarot stories for another day. For now, since I’m playing with WordPress for the first time, I’d like to try uploading an image:

The Fool, one of my favorite cards.
D.
Here’s Nathanael West, author of Miss Lonelyhearts, The Day of the Locust, A Cool Million, and The Dream Life of Balso Snell, writing about writing:
Forget the epic, the master work. In America fortunes do not accumulate, the soil does not grow, families have no history. Leave slow growth to the book reviewers, you only have time to explode. Remember William Carlos Williams’ description of the pioneer women who shot their children against the wilderness like cannonballs. Do the same with your novels.
Some writers* provide the know-how you need to get the job done; others, like West in this passage, or like John Gardner in The Art of Fiction, light a fire under your ass and demand that you get the job done.
Both are useful. Right now, two days into my three-day weekend and not a single page edited, I’d take the pyromaniac over the technician. That’s why I’m reading and rereading West’s war cry.
West and his wife Eileen died in a car accident in 1940. West was 37.
D.
*Writers who write about writing. Eh, you know what I mean.
Hat tip to Blue Gal for today’s post, Best Bible Lesson Ever. BG has linked to a radio interview (or is it a podcast?) of Don Alexander, a former school principal who has written Darnia’s Quest: A Spiritual Journey to Awaken Your Imagination. (Worst. Title. Ever?) He bills this as a Christian alternative to Harry Potter.
Mind you, he has never read a single one of J.K. Rowling’s books (you’ll need to scroll to the bottom of that MyWestTexas article). He doesn’t need to. And I doubt he has seen Brokeback Mountain, but he has made up his mind about that, too. It’s also quite clear from the interview that he has read only one verse from Leviticus, but he’s not afraid to use it to support his all-consuming fear repressed shameful des — oh, Lord, I can’t say it! hatred of homosexuals.
Hmm. What do they have to say about Alexander’s book over at Amazon?
Christian Alternative to the Harry Potter Series – Five StarsQuite Simply the best Christian Book for kids out there right now. It has adventure, romance, and a plot so thick that you’ll want to read it again and again. If your child reads Harry Potter, get them hooked on the Dar’s Quest series–then they’ll leave Harry.
And so I asked myself: WWJGD?
Jesus’ General wouldn’t take this lying down. He’d head on over there and post his own review.
Thus:
Disturbing Homo-Erotic undertones – One StarAs a Christian Father of three impresionabel young children, mr.Alexander’s BOok disturbed me greatly. Mind you, we only read (we Read A Loud) the first page, but that was enough to decide me. For shame, mr.Alexander!!!
PS i understand from Your radio Interviws you never read a Harry Potter book, yet you say such bad things. So I dont feel to bad only reading one page of yours.
I’ll let you know if Amazon picks it up. In the meantime, you have your work cut out for you.
D.
Paperback Writer starts a brand spankin’ new gig:
For this new feature, I’d like to do a weekly variation on the open thread: 20 Questions Friday. You post a writing- or industry-related question in comments, and I’d try to answer it, up to twenty questions max per Friday (any more than 20 and I’ll never get any work done.)
Damn me, all I can think of is something dumb like, “Do you have a pill that will get me to edit ten times faster?”
Hopefully, some of you night owls will step in where I have failed. Pony up those questions, folks! This should be a great feature.
D.
Yesterday, I caught the end of The Moody Blues’ Nights in White Satin, and it made me think — as it always does — of a summer in the early 1970s, the livingroom of my first house, a slow morning, our old console hi-fi, Derek & the Dominoes’ Layla (the original version, of course, not that acoustic horror Clapton later perpetrated), Nights in White Satin, and the end of John Christopher’s The City of Gold and Lead.
The City of Gold and Lead is the second of Christopher’s Tripods trilogy, which was H.G. Wells’ War of the Worlds written down for kids. (A reviewer over at Amazon made that observation, not me. But it irks me to have this pointed out to me thirty-some years later. Damn it, I should have noticed.) The story itself is unimportant. Earth has been subjugated by aliens who roam the planet in giant mechanical tripods. They live in domed cities and enslave human children. A group of friends, all young boys, enter one of the cities as part of a plot to defeat the Tripods . . .
Spoiler alert. (But Christopher wrote the trilogy in the late 60s/early 70s. If you haven’t read it yet, I doubt you will now.)
. . . and some of the kids don’t make it out.
I’m finding it difficult to put into words the magic of that ending. You know how middle books in a trilogy are supposed to be the weakest of the three? Not this one, not for me. The first and third books combined didn’t have one-tenth the impact of this book, all because I had never before read a book with such a sad ending.
I’d read disturbing books before. Julia Cunningham’s Dorp Dead creeped me out, but had (as best I can recall) an uplifting ending. I’d read Golding’s Lord of the Flies, but I don’t think I understood the ending until I reread it as an older teenager. The only comparable experience I’d had was not with a book, but with Nicolas Roeg’s film Walkabout, which I saw at its Los Angeles premiere in 1971 (hey, I got around. And, might I add, Jenny Agutter’s naked body made quite the impression on 9-year-old me). If you’ve never seen Walkabout, I won’t spoil it for you. Find it, rent it. It disturbed me for days. It still disturbs me.
The ending of The City of Gold and Lead didn’t pack the same emotional punch as Walkabout, but I have never forgotten my reaction:
Sadness, of course.
Surprise, that a book could end this way.
More surprise, that a book could make me feel this way.
It changed the way I looked at books. I began to realize how much I enjoyed the emotional reaction evoked in me by a good book, and how pleasurable it could be to feel such powerfully unpleasant emotions.
I’d like to say this was the first of many such experiences, but sadly, for me such books have been few and far between. Yet the ones which have stuck with me are all tragedies.
Your turn.
D.
For those of you who like fantasy, SF, and other spec fiction, Tangent has several new reviews:
E. Sedia reviews “The Dope Fiend” by Lavie Tidhar (SCI FICTION),
Aimee Poynter reviews “The Girl with the Heart of Stone” by Leah Bobet (Strange Horizons),
Paul Abbamondi reviews Amazing Journeys Volume 2, Issue 10,
and I review Challenging Destiny #21.
That ought to keep you busy.
D.
Buggery Blogger is only part of the reason I haven’t been posting much lately. It’s back-to-work week, and my mind and body agree that waking up early sucks. I feel like crap, and even Edna Mode can’t cheer me up.
This comes from Bookseller Chick:
Since you’ve read lots of Harlequin Presents, would you maybe have any recollections of a book I’m trying to find? –A girl gets together with a guy in a van during a snowstorm. They are complete strangers. To keep warm, they may or may not have sex. Through most of the book, he thinks she is all too promiscuous. This tortures him. Of course she is actually a bookworm and introvert. He just happens to see her a second time after she has just had a makeover and is wearing a form-fitting sweater.
The cover features a brunette wearing a yellow sweater and maybe a plaid skirt. It’s a plain white background. Published before 1996 I believe but newer than the early 80s ones where nothing happens before marriage. Can you help?
If any of you can name that book, go help out the BSC, okay? Link above.
Here’s one of my own:
Pub date, 1970s. Science Fiction. A guy wakes up one day to find himself in a 12-year-old body — his own, about thirty years ago. Somehow, he’s living out the fantasy of being a kid again “with all I know now.” He turns the tables on his flirtatious cousin who used to make his life hell, and he rakes in the dough on horseraces (conveniently, he remembers some key race results). The mob gets wind of his success and wants to know how he does it. Eventually, he gets gunned down by the mob.
He wakes up on a space ship. Aliens have granted him three wishes, and he just screwed up his first wish. The next two-thirds of the book concern his other wishes. In one, he’s back in his 40-something-year-old body, but with superhuman strength and amazing sexual powers. Trouble is, his physiology is different, so alcohol makes him violently ill. Things end badly after he throws up on an important business client.
***
While I have Bookseller Chick’s attention . . .
Yesterday in the grocery store, I picked up a paperback edition of Tuesdays with Morrie. I remembered reading something about this in a magazine, and it sounded like a cool idea for a book. In the store, I looked at the acknowledgements. Author Mitch Albom acknowledges, among other people, a rabbi. Okay, so that’s good. Next, I read the first two pages. The writing is a bit too slick and a bit too cute, but still, the guy writes a good hook. I’m a millimeter away from buying this thing, but then I get to the deal-breaker.
You see, I’m curious about this “wisdom” thing. If Morrie is so full of wisdom, says I, I ought to be able to open the book at random and find some of that wisdom. I did just that, and soon realized that all dialog in the book is written like this:
“Here’s me saying something.” That’s Morrie. No ‘Morrie said,’ nothin’.
And here’s the author saying something back. No quotes. No ‘I said.’
Albom distinguishes between his voice and Morrie’s by the use of quotes or the lack of quotes. No saids at all.
I’m not saying it was intelligent or rational to put the book back on the rack, but I did. Maybe it’s a wonderful book. I’ll never know. Looking at that single page of dialog, I knew a whole book of that would drive me nuts.
I have other quirks, too. Pretentiousness is a deal-breaker for me; I’ve never made it past the first page of Unbearable Lightness of Being. I liked the first sentence of Stephen King’s The Gunslinger,
The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed.
but after the second sentence, I put it back on the shelf:
The desert was the apotheosis of all deserts, huge, standing to the sky for what might have been parsecs in all directions.
First I’m looking at a crisp cinematic image (good), then I’m looking at King tap-tapping at his keyboard (not good).
The first paperback I ever bought with my own money (for fifty cents, I think), The Path Beyond the Stars, had as its first line,
It was axiomatic, Jon Wood groused.
How do I remember that? Because my brother, who thought it ridiculous for a six-year-old to spend his money on paperbacks, snatched the book from my hands and said, “Look at that! There’s two words in the first sentence you can’t possibly understand.” Never mind that he didn’t know the meaning of axiomatic or groused either. This was a dare and, dammit, I read the whole thing. And remembered that first sentence forevere’n’ever.
But I’m not six anymore. For adult Doug, if an author wants to throw apotheosis around, he’d damn well better have a good reason to do it.
Call me snobbish or neurotic or a miserable little prick. I deserve it. All I’m saying is, these are deal-breakers for me, and I’m one of the guys in your book-buying audience.
What are your deal-breakers? Bookseller Chick, do you have any thoughts about this?
D.