Category Archives: Stardust


Rest in Peace, Jack

D.

What you never hardly ever see

With regard to race, Stephen Colbert has a running gag. “I don’t see race. People tell me I’m white, and I believe them because . . . ” Insert punchline. Last week, in the context of the preferential prosecution of black people for drug-related crimes, the ‘because’ was, “. . . because I get my drugs from a pharmacy.” He’ll also claim (with his typical in-character, right-wing intransigence) that racism no longer exists in America because, hey, look, we have a black President!

I doubt any of my readers would see this as anything but satire. What may not be immediately obvious, however, is the pervasive intolerance of the American entertainment industry to anyone who is other. Other than white, middle or upper class, and for the most part male. My question is, for the major media — TV, movies — how often do you see someone who is other in a role in which that otherness is not central? I would argue that the answer is hardly ever, with the notable exception of male black actors, especially Will Smith, Morgan Freeman, Samuel L. Jackson, and Denzel Washington. The big box office black actors are cast in blockbusters in which their blackness is not an issue. There can even be an interracial romantic angle without that interracial-ness becoming central (e.g., Will Smith’s relationship with Charlize Theron in Hancock). Other non-white males? Not so much.

I began thinking about this after reading the May Rolling Stone interview of Peter Dinklage, the 42-year-old, New Jersey-born star of HBO’s Game of Thrones, who happens to have achondroplasia.

peter-dinklage-440

Folks who watch Game of Thrones will immediately note that Dinklage’s character is not only a dwarf, but his dwarfism is central to the role, and indeed not an episode goes by in which someone (usually in a pejorative way) points out his dwarfism. Yet the role of Tyrion is a far cry from the usual Wizard of Oz style little-man, or the cute/bumbling/avaricious dwarves of Time Bandits. Tyrion is a wonderfully complex character, easily one of the most noble characters in the story.

According to the Rolling Stone interview, Dinklage is particularly proud of his role in Death at a Funeral, in which his role was not written for a dwarf. Dinklage, a tremendously talented actor, may have broken into the mainstream. Time will tell.

But think about all of the roles we rarely see in American-made TV or movies:

We rarely see Asians cast in major roles in which their Asian-ness is not somehow an issue. Charlotte Sometimes, in which all three major characters are Asian, may be a notable exception — I don’t know, I haven’t seen it.

Hispanic actors: ditto, although a few actresses (Jennifer Lopez, Michelle Rodriguez, or Rosario Dawson — who is very, very multi-ethnic) have broken the mold. And the men? Edward James Olmos is the only one who comes to mind.

And when have you ever seen a Native American cast in a “normal” role? I’m talking about actresses or actors (such as Wes Studi, or Russell Means) who are recognizably indigenous. Being 1/16 Cherokee like Cher doesn’t count.

LGBT. If they’re there, they’re there BECAUSE of their otherness, or they’re there for comic relief (which I guess is the same thing).

Disabled people: same thing.

I suspect it’s all about box office receipts (or the TV advertising dollar), or really, producers’ perceptions as to what will be financially successful. Whether their perceptions comport with reality is an excellent question. I would like to think that Americans are ready for a gay Asian woman starring as the lead detective in some big box office serial killer flick, but who knows.

Okay, enough procrastinating. Time for me to get back to my writing.

D.

Britain’s loudest national resource

Brian Blessed: I love this guy. 74, and I hope he’s here to bellow at us on his 100th birthday.

D.

Olbermann’s last show

Long, long week, with nothing easy or straightforward, culminating in a long day of clinic and OR and pus and blood and yuck. So I poured myself a stiff Hendrick’s and Pernod (which I really ought to name some time) (and yes oh by the way I’m off call) and zoned out watching Olbermann for the night, and here he goes and announces this, tonight, is the last Countdown.

First thought: I had more to drink than I thought. But it’s true.

Countdown to us socialists, well, it’s like Bill O’Reilly or Glenn Beck to the nation’s psychotics. A daily shot of validation, the knowledge that (A) someone else thinks the same way we do most of the time and (B) can get great ratings yammering those opinions. But now he’s gone, and we’re supposed to believe that Comcast’s purchase of NBC has nothing to do with it. I’ll believe that if Rachel Maddow keeps her job.

Someone on Daily Kos who claims to have the inside track (but freely admits we have no reason to believe him) says

the next time we see Keith Olbermann on TV, he’ll be back alongside Dan Patrick talking about sports.

Well, good for him. It’s what he loves. And too bad for those of us who have no interest in sports.

We still have Rachel. For how long, I have no idea.

In other news, Betelgeuse may be going supernova.

D.

I miss them both.

Heaven has all the best comics.

D.

Now I know what’s been missing in my life.

Will Smith hasn’t made a movie since 2008.

In 2008, he made Hancock, a great flick in case you’ve never seen it — definitely a good one to watch on cable or rent on NetFlix. He also made the awful Seven Pounds, which we’ll forget about, since every star is allowed the occasional dog.

On his IMDB page, take a look at his “in development” list: thirty films. I realize he won’t make all of these, maybe not even the majority, but thirty? Is he going to clone himself? Isn’t he worried about oversaturation?

In other news: did you know Ernest Borgnine is still turning out movies? He’s been in a lot of low profile productions, but look at 2010 for him: four films in post-production. Productive at age 93, how blessed is that? Hell, he even has Mickey Rooney beat (two films in post-production at age 90).

And if you’re at all curious who has Ernie Borgnine beat, check Answer Bag.

D.

RIP

Art Linkletter died today. They said on the radio that he was 97, and that he had published yet another book three years ago. Amazing, isn’t it, how some of the big personalities from my childhood are only now winding down? Jack LaLanne turns 96 this year, and he still looks great. John Rovick turns 91 this year (Sheriff John). I wish Bob Keeshan were still around, but he passed away just a few years ago.

For Art Linkletter’s sake, I hope there is a heaven, and he’s visited every day by the kids whom he met on TV.

D.

Wealthy as Croesus

Just got done watching The Family Man, a 2000 film from Nicholas Cage’s production company, Saturn Films. Cage is (for me, anyway) mesmerizing as usual, so an otherwise bland and predictable plot didn’t manage to drag down the movie. The Family Man is basically a latter day It’s A Wonderful Life, with Cage in the George Bailey role, Don Cheadle as the angel Clarence. Granted, it’s an inverse Wonderful Life, since Jack Campbell’s (the Cage character’s) real life is sucky, and the imaginary one is divine.

cage_leoniThe movie is a paean to the simple pleasures. What good is wealth if you’re alone, and aren’t the joys of a loving wife and two great kids ample recompense for a top job on Wall Street, a hot car, and a high-rent Manhattan condo?

Is it possible to give spoilers on a ten-year-old movie? If so, you’ve been warned. Once Jack gets enough of a taste of life with Kate & the kids to know this life is superior to the real one, Don Cheadle (another actor with riveting stage presence, btw) reappears and Jack knows the jig is up, he’s been given his “glimpse” of an alternate life, and now it’s back to Wall Street for him. But the old life is empty and he wants Kate, who in this universe he left over a decade ago, dumped really, and she’s long since gotten over him and moved on. No husband or boyfriend conveniently enough, but she does have a box of old boyfriend Jack’s stuff which she wants to unload on him before moving to Paris.

He tries to make headway with her, but she is over him, I mean really OVER him, and all the soulful looks in the world won’t penetrate. Paraphrasing here, “Yeah, you broke my heart once, Jack, but that was a long time ago, and I’ve moved on.” He begs her not to get on the plane but she blows him off. It’s all very moving, and if she had gotten on the plane, and if perhaps we could then see Jack striking up a conversation with someone new, this would have been a great movie. Think about it: there’s the tragedy of what he has lost, but at least he’s learned enough that maybe there’s hope for him yet. Not a Happily Ever After, but honest, because in real life you can’t go home again, but you can make a new home elsewhere.

This movie? Nuh-uh, not honest. Kate’s in the boarding line and Jack starts yelling about how they have a house in Jersey, and two kids, and how they still love each other after all these years, and how she won’t even let him touch her unless he tells her he loves her, and how their daughter can’t play violin very well but is precocious nonetheless, yatta yatta yatta . . .

Bad turn by the screenwriter, because I don’t care past relationship together or no, this woman who hasn’t heard from this guy in what, 15 years, she’s gonna be thinking, Crazy. Stalkerish crazy. And she’s gonna be calling security if he takes one more step towards her. Instead, she has coffee with him. Role credits.

The irony here is that Nicholas Cage the real life dude makes Jack Campbell look like a burger-slinger. He owns his own production company, Saturn Films, which has been turning out some big movies since 2000, including National Treasure. Cage is on his third marriage, and at one point owned 15 homes (including an island near Nassau and a 24,000 square foot home in Rhode Island), a “flotilla of yachts . . . [and] a squadron of Rolls Royces,” as well as lots of odd purchases of jewelry, art, and a big fossilized dinosaur head, for which he overbid Leo DiCaprio.

No one can accuse Cage of making nothing but HEA movies (Bangkok Dangerous and Knowing, to name two, had downbeat endings), so perhaps he can be forgiven for making one film with a sentimental ending. But it seems to me that if anyone understood how The Family Man should have ended, it would have been Nicholas Cage.

D.

My favorite Night Gallery episode

With two of my favorite actors from the old days, Vincent Price and Bill Bixby. The scene starts about 45 seconds in.

Just a portion, unfortunately, and it lacks the ending (wherein Bixby asks the woman, “You don’t suppose there’s anything to that curse, do you?” and she laughs wickedly). But this vid gives you a taste of the camp.

(NO, the earwig episode is NOT my favorite. That one still gives me the creeps. Even if it does have otolarynologic relevance.)

D.

Too much penis

The wife and I like Spartacus: Blood and Sand, but based on the comments at IMDB, not everyone is amused.

Nothing wrong with some nudity now and then, and it had a kind of balance of male/female nudity at the start, though the ammount was a bit stupid. I’m up to ep 5, and I’m liking that they’re toning down the ammount of nudity a bit, but damn, the writers must love penis, because it shows up fully every 20min or so in rather long cuts.

With female nudity, everything is generally tucked away and neat, but seeing penises flapping about this much is starting to get grating

This initiated an interesting thread wherein, among other sparkling moments, one commenter complained that all of this homoeroticism is historically inaccurate, and another commenter set that commenter most righteously in her place.

Me? I don’t care about all the penis and male derrieres. There are plenty of perfect unaugmented breasts (implants would be rather anachronistic) and lovely ungroomed bush and shapely female buns to counterbalance the bouncing wee-wees. And Lucy Lawless’s breasts! Great expanses of aureolae bigger than Brazil! XENA WARRIOR PRINCESS’S CASSAVA MELONS!

Sometimes, they wear clothes.

Sometimes, they wear clothes.


Oh, and it’s violent, too. Bludgeoning stabbing decapitating skull-crushing castrating crucifyingly violent.

I think there’s a story in there, too, but it bewilders me what that would be. Like all Americans, I just watch it for the nudity and violence.

While I love watching this show, I can’t seem to understand some of the unnecessary sex scene. I understand that the producers are trying to portray an accurate picture of rome but it seems as though they are doing too much. For ex, I think ep 6 when Lucy lawless is being bathe by the 3 slaves then comes in old and out of shape John Hannah who then grabs the slave girl hands and puts it on his penis and then about a minute later begins to force himself on the slave girl per instructions from Lucy lawless. I’m not sure what the significance of that scene was*. The show is suppose to be about gladiators fighting in the arena but it’s full of crude sex scenes that have no significance to the show.

Well, maybe not all Americans.

D.

*The wife rather pragmatically points out that there IS a point. This is all leading up to a slave revolt, after all, so it’s important to demonstrate that slaves were regarded as property by their owners, to be used and abused at will, again, and again, and again.

Next page →